Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Moore v State of New South Wales [2014] FCA 477 Citation: Moore v State of New South Wales [2014] FCA 477
Parties: AXEL MOORE (BY HIS LITIGATION REPRESENTATIVE IAN ANDERSON) v THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES, BATEAU BAY PUBLIC SCHOOL PARENTS & CITIZENS' ASSOCIATION, MAUREEN GRAY and SUE TURL
File number(s): NSD 1502 of 2013
Judge(s): YATES J
Date of judgment: 9 May 2014
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – application by litigation representative for approval of agreement under r 9.71 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 46P, 46PH Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4, 5, 6, 24, 42 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 9.70, 9.71
Date of hearing: 7 April, 9 May 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr B Fogarty Solicitor for the Applicant: Brazel Moore Lawyers Counsel for the First and Third Respondents: Mr P Ginters
Solicitor for the First and Third Respondents: Hicksons Lawyers Solicitor for the Second and Fourth Respondents: Kennedys Lawyers (Mr A Bolton appearing) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1502 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate