Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Marsh Pty Ltd v Vickery [2014] FCA 484 Citation: Marsh Pty Ltd v Vickery [2014] FCA 484
Parties: MARSH PTY LTD v NOEL VICKERY
File number: SAD 310 of 2012
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 15 May 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for further and better production of documents under subpoena – whether addressee had complied with subpoena – where subpoena required production of electronic properties of documents originating in electronic form – where documents produced documents in hard copy – where electronic properties not produced – application to set aside subpoena on grounds of oppression – where electronic documents within the scope of the subpoena archived on server located in United States – where compliance with subpoena will be costly and time consuming. Held: Application for further and better production allowed. Application to set aside subpoena dismissed. Orders made for production of documents under subpoena.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 24.15, 24.17, 24.22 Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (US)
Date of hearing: 9 May 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms N Charlesworth
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate