Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 505 Citation: Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 505
Parties: TAMMY MAREE STANFORD and JAMIE DUNSMORE v DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LTD and JOHNSON & JOHNSON MEDICAL PTY LIMITED
File number: NSD 213 of 2011
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 15 May 2014
Date of hearing: 14 May 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicants: Dr DE Graham SC with Mr NM Bender
Solicitor for the First Applicant: Maurice Blackburn Lawyers
Solicitor for the Second Applicant: Shine Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr SG Finch SC with Ms DM Bampton
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Herbert Smith Freehills
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Norton Rose Fulbright
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 213 of 2011
BETWEEN: TAMMY MAREE STANFORD
First Applicant
JAMIE DUNSMORE
Second Applicant
AND: DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LTD
First Respondent
JOHNSON & JOHNSON MEDICAL PTY LIMITED
Second Respondent
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 15 MAY 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The hearing dates for the period 2 June 2014 to 1 August 2014 be vacated. 2. The applicants pay the respondents' costs, if any, thrown away by reason of the vacation of those hearing dates. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate