Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
RPR Maintenance Pty Ltd v Marmax Investments Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 514 Citation: RPR Maintenance Pty Ltd v Marmax Investments Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 514
Parties: RPR MAINTENANCE PTY LTD (ACN 003 610 231) v MARMAX INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 001 147 511) and SPANLINE WEATHERSTRONG BUILDING SYSTEMS PTY LTD (ACN 002 968 087)
File number(s): NSD 804 of 2012
Judge(s): GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 22 May 2014
Catchwords: RELIEF – whether damages should be grossed up for tax – assessing quantum of damages
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: New South Wales Cancer Council v Sarfaty (1992) 28 NSWLR 68 RPR Maintenance Pty Ltd v Marmax Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 681 RPR Maintenance Pty Ltd v Marmax Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1311 RPR Maintenance Pty Ltd v Marmax Investments Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 409
Date of hearing: 24 - 28 March 2014, 2 April 2014
Date of last submissions: 14 May 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms K Rees SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Newhouse & Arnold Solicitors
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T J Rickard
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Martin & Holmes Legal
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr M P Cleary
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Elliot & Sochaki Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate