Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 516 Citation: Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 516
Parties: JOHN WALTER GRAHAM AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE NGADJU PEOPLE v STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, ST IVES GOLD MINING COMPANY PTY LIMITED and BHP BILLITON NICKEL WEST PTY LTD
File number: WAD 6020 of 1998
Judge: MARSHALL ACJ
Date of judgment: 21 May 2014
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – extinguishment – native title rights and interests – articulation and formulation of native title rights – mining tenements – minerals and petroleum – rights of access to tenements
Legislation: Forests Act 1918 (WA) s 46 Land Act 1898 (WA) s 152 Land Act 1933 (WA) ss 33, 116 Land Amendment Act 1905 (WA) s 10 Mining Act 1904 (WA) Mining Act 1978 (WA) s 5(1) Mining Regulations 1925 (WA) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 47A, 47B
Cases cited: Akiba v Commonwealth [2013] HCA 33, (2013) 300 ALR 1 Banjima People v Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 868, (2013) 305 ALR 1 Brown v Western Australia (2012) 208 FCR 505 Daniel v Western Australia [2003] FCA 666 Graham v Western Australia [2012] FCA 1455 Karpany v Dietman [2013] HCA 47, (2013) 303 ALR 216 Neowarra v Western Australia [2003] FCA 1402 Western Australia v Brown [2014] HCA 8, (2014) 306 ALR 168 Western Australia v Graham [2013] FCAFC 143, (2013) 305 ALR 452
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate