Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Winn v Leigh [2014] FCA 518 Citation: Winn v Leigh [2014] FCA 518
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Winn v Leigh [2014] FCCA 573
Parties: JULENE WINN v DAVID LEIGH
File number: QUD 79 of 2014
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 15 May 2014
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – indemnity costs awarded against applicant by Federal Circuit Court – applicant alleges terms and nature of costs order pronounced in court differed from order issued to the parties – whether the primary judge erred in making the costs order – whether leave to appeal should be granted
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Federal Circuit Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Sch 1
Cases cited: Adam P. Brown Male Fashions Proprietary Limited v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 DÉcor Corporation Proprietary Limited v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Kyriackou v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2010] FCA 253 Merit Protection Commissioner v Nonnenmacher (1999) 86 FCR 112 Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125 Rickus v Motor Trades Association of Australia Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd [2010] FCAFC 16
Date of hearing: 15 May 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate