Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Anglo Coal (Dawson Services) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 522 Citation: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Anglo Coal (Dawson Services) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 522
Parties: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION v ANGLO COAL (DAWSON SERVICES) PTY LTD
File number: QUD 198 of 2014
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 23 May 2014
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – interlocutory application seeking reinstatement of employee miner – employee applicant union's lodge president at the mine – employee terminated for taking sick leave after annual leave application rejected – alleged contraventions of Part 3-1 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – principles in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 – concession by respondent that aspects of applicant's case raised serious questions for determination – proposed undertaking by respondent to provide pay and benefits without work in lieu of reinstatement until substantive hearing - whether balance of convenience favours reinstatement pending determination of substantive hearing – whether social and psychological benefits of work – strength of applicant's case for final relief – whether tendency for reinstatement to undermine discipline at workplace – whether evidence of breakdown of confidence and trust – alleged inconvenience to applicant in relation to employee's discharge of union duties – balance of convenience favours interlocutory order for reinstatement
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Pt 3-1 ss 340, 346, 352 and 545
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 applied Australian Postal Corporation v Stephens [2011] FCA 947 cited Automotive, Foods, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Eaton Electrical Systems Pty Ltd (2005) 139 IR 260 cited Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v McCain Foods (Aust) Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1126 cited Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Phillips Engineering Aus Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 611 cited Blackadder v Ramsey Butchering Services Pty Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 539 cited Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 971 cited Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BPH Coal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1218 cited National Tertiary Education Union v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology [2013] FCA 451 cited Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 286 ALR 257; [2011] FCAFC 156 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate