Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Perumal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 555 Citation: Perumal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 555
Appeal from: Perumal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCCA 2105
Parties: POONGOTHAI BAGAVATI PERUMAL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 44 of 2014
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 26 May 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from dismissal of application for judicial review – whether Tribunal was required to take into account a particular consideration – whether 2 year study requirement in reg 1.15F of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) satisfied – whether procedural fairness denied – no jurisdictional error – appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) regs 1.15F, 1.15F(1)(b), 1.15F(1)(c), cl 485.213 of Schedule 2
Cases cited: Perumal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCCA 210 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 Assistant Commissioner Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd (2013) 87 ALJR 458 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS (2012) 243 CLR 164
Date of hearing: 26 May 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate