Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Eriksson v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] FCA 561 Citation: Eriksson v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] FCA 561
Appeal from: Commonwealth Bank of Australia Limited trading as Bank West v Eriksson [2013] FCCA 2058 (6 December 2013)
Parties: TREVOR JAMES ERIKSSON v COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ABN 48 123 123 124)
File number: NSD 2604 of 2013
Judge: PAGONE J
Date of judgment: 29 May 2014
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application to set aside sequestration order – appeal by way of rehearing – whether debtor had viable cross-claim equal to or exceeding amount of judgment debt subject of creditor's petition – whether deed of release covered cross-claim – discretion of Federal Circuit Court to adjourn or dismiss creditor's petition to allow debtor to pursue cross-claim.
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 40(1)(g) Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24(1)(d)
Cases cited: Allesch v Maunz (2000) 203 CLR 172 George v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2005) 212 ALR 495 Grant v John Grant & Sons Pty Ltd (1954) 91 CLR 112 Karam v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2001] NSWSC 709 O'Brien v Bank of Western Australia Limited [2013] NSWCA 71 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Rigg v Baker (2006) 236 ALR 629 Thredgold v Fyfe Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1363 Westpac Banking Corporation v Billgate Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1304
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate