Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sino Australia Oil & Gas Ltd [2014] FCA 565 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sino Australia Oil & Gas Ltd [2014] FCA 565
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v SINO AUSTRALIA OIL & GAS LTD
File number: VID 161 of 2014
Judge: DAVIES J
Date of judgment: 30 May 2014
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for injunction under s 1323(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – ongoing ASIC investigation into alleged contraventions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by the company and its directors – necessary and desirable to grant injunction in order to protect investors' interests
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 180, 181, 182, 674, 710, 724, 728, 729, 1041A, 1041B, 1041H, 1323(1) and 1323(6)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler (2001) 38 ACSR 266; [2001] NSWSC 451 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Burke [2000] NSWSC 694 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Burnard (2007) 64 ACSR 360 Australian Securities and Investments Commission; In the matter of Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Carey (No 3) [2006] FCA 433 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Lee [2007] FCA 918 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sigalla (2009) 74 ACSR 710; [2009] NSWSC 1205 Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) v Oswal (No 4) [2011] FCA 1503
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate