Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Aneja v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 572 Citation: Aneja v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 572
Appeal from: Aneja v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor [2014] FCCA 413
Parties: VIKRAM ANEJA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 115 of 2014
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 22 May 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – student visa – appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court – failure to appear at Migration Review Tribunal – failure to maintain current address for service – whether Tribunal was required to ensure receipt of notice given under s 360 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – application of Murphy v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 135 FCR 550 Held: not unreasonable for Tribunal to proceed without appellant where service has been properly effected according to the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – appeal dismissed – costs awarded
Legislation: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 cited Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 87 ALJR 618 followed Murphy v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 135 FCR 550 followed Swee Yen Tay v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 183 FCR 163 followed Xie v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 172 followed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate