Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Unilever Australia Ltd v Revlon Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 573 Citation: Unilever Australia Ltd v Revlon Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 573
Parties: UNILEVER AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 004 050 828 v REVLON AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED ACN 095 360 731
File number: NSD 508 of 2014
Judge: JACOBSON J
Date of judgment: 3 June 2014
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – s 18 Australian Consumer Law – claim for interlocutory injunctive relief restraining the publication of marketing material – whether statements made in print and television advertisements as to the performance of consumer products are misleading or deceptive – whether Court's discretion should be exercised in favour of granting interlocutory injunction
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) s 18
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304 Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45 General Newspapers Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation (1993) 45 FCR 164 GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd (2013) 305 ALR 363 Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238 Shercliff v Engadine Acceptance Corporation Pty Ltd [1978] 1 NSWLR 729 Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (1992) 38 FCR 1 Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 59
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate