Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
National Retail Association v Fair Work Commission [2014] FCA 583 Citation: National Retail Association v Fair Work Commission [2014] FCA 583
Parties: NATIONAL RETAIL ASSOCIATION v FAIR WORK COMMISSION and SHOP, DISTRIBUTIVE AND ALLIED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
File number: QUD 140 of 2014
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 28 May 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – industrial law – application for joinder – without joiner, no appropriate contradictor – no objection as to joinder application Held: applicant in interlocutory applicant to be named second respondent
Legislation: Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Cases cited: R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13
Date of hearing: 28 May 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Malouf
Solicitor for the Applicant: National Retail Association Legal
Counsel for the First Respondent: The First Respondent did not appear
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Macpherson & Kelley Lawyers as town agent for AJ Macken & Co
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION QUD 140 of 2014
BETWEEN: NATIONAL RETAIL ASSOCIATION
Applicant
AND: FAIR WORK COMMISSION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate