Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ejueyitsi v Bond University [2014] FCA 587 Citation: Ejueyitsi v Bond University [2014] FCA 587
Appeal from: Application for extension of time and leave to appeal: Ejueyitsi v Bond University [2013] FCCA 2402
Parties: VINCENT EJUEYITSI v BOND UNIVERSITY
File number: QUD 141 of 2014
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 29 May 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to seek leave to appeal and application for leave to appeal against costs order made by Federal Circuit Court – application dismissed
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) s 18 Federal Circuit Court Act 1999 (Cth) s 79(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1A) and 24(1)(d) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 35.13 and 35.14(1) Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 21.02(1) and 30.10(a)
Cases cited: DÉcor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 495 Kyriackou v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2010] FCA 253 Merit Protection Commissioner v Nonnemacher (1999) 86 FCR 112 Rickus v Motor Trades Association of Australia Superannuation Fund Pty Limited [2010] FCAFC 16 Wilson v Alexander (2003) 135 FCR 273
Date of hearing: 29 May 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate