Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Investa Properties Pty Ltd v Nankervis (No 4) [2014] FCA 589 Citation: Investa Properties Pty Ltd v Nankervis (No 4) [2014] FCA 589
Parties: INVESTA PROPERTIES PTY LTD (ACN 084 407 241) and INVESTA RESIDENTIAL GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 098 527 390) v ASHLEY COLIN NANKERVIS, ADAM KIMBERLY BARCLAY and OLIVER HUME SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND PTY LTD (ACN 128 863 230)
File number: QUD 231 of 2011
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 4 June 2014
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – ss 56(1) and 136 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – objection by respondent to evidence on basis of inadmissibility against that respondent – evidence not inadmissible against other respondents – whether unfairly prejudicial, misleading or confusing
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 56(1), 136
Cases cited: ASIC v MacDonald [2008] NSWSC 995 ASIC v Vines (2003) 48 ACSR 282; [2013] NSWSC 995 Eire Contractors Pty Ltd v O'Brien [2012] NSWCA 400 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 8) (2005) 224 ALR 317; [2005] FCA 1348 Silbermann v CGU Insurance Ltd (2003) 48 ASCR 231; [2003] NSWSC 1127
Date of hearing: 4 June 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate