Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kiefel v State of Victoria [2014] FCA 604 Citation: Kiefel v State of Victoria [2014] FCA 604
Appeal from: Kiefel v State of Victoria [2013] FCA 1398
Parties: JAMES KIEFEL (BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, WENDY KIEFEL) v STATE OF VICTORIA (DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT)
File number: VID 59 of 2014
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 12 June 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – Application for security for costs against litigation representative – role and function of litigation representative – principles applicable to order for security for costs on an appeal –where litigation representative and appellant resident outside Australia – whether order for security would stultify appeal –whether litigation representative impecunious – public interest in disability discrimination proceedings involving education in public schools – application refused.
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56 Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 28 r 3 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 9.64, 36.09
Cases cited: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Dzienciol (by his guardian ad litem Dzienciol) [2001] WASC 305 (S) Australia China Business Bureau v MCP Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1207 Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 2 FCR 1 Branir v Owston Nominees (No 2) (2001) 117 FCR 424; [2001] FCA 1833 Cameron's Unit Services Pty Ltd v Kevin R Whelpton & Associates (Australia) Pty Ltd (1986) 13 FCR 46 Cowell v Taylor (1886) 31 Ch D 34 Dae Boong International Company Pty Ltd v Gray [2009] NSWCA 11 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v P (1987) 11 NSWLR 200 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 Dye v Commonwealth Securities Ltd [2012] FCA 992 Farrell (by her next friend Waugh) v Royal Kings Park Tennis Club (Inc) [2007] WASCA 173 Fernando (by his tutor, John Ley) v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 9) [2009] FCA 833 Fletcher v Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 37 FCR 288 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Kennedy v McGeechan [1978] 1 NSWLR 314 L v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (2006) 91 ALD 258; [2006] FCAFC 114 Logue v Hansen Technologies Ltd (2003) 125 FCR 590; [2003] FCA 81 Madgwick v Kelly (2013) 212 FCR 1; [2013] FCAFC 61 Masterman-Lister v Brutton and Co (Nos 1 and 2) [2003] 1 WLR 1511 NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation v Abualfoul (1999) 94 FCR 247; [1999] FCA 433 Re Beth [2013] VSC 189 Rhodes v Swithenbank (1889) 22 QBD 577 Skyring v Sweeney [1999] FCA 61 Tait v Bindal People [2002] FCA 322 Walker v State of Victoria [2012] FCAFC 38 Daniell's Chancery Practice (7th ed, 1932)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate