Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Investa Properties Pty Ltd v Nankervis (No 5) [2014] FCA 632 Citation: Investa Properties Pty Ltd v Nankervis (No 5) [2014] FCA 632
Parties: INVESTA PROPERTIES PTY LTD (ACN 084 407 241) and INVESTA RESIDENTIAL GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 098 527 390) v ASHLEY COLIN NANKERVIS, ADAM KIMBERLY BARCLAY and OLIVER HUME SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND PTY LTD (ACN 128 863 230)
File number: QUD 231 of 2011
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 16 June 2014
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – whether documents "business records" – emails – whether expert valuations in documents admissible – whether asserted facts – whether documents produced by persons with specialised knowledge – not expert reports
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 69(1), 69(2)(b), 76, 79, 135, 136
Cases cited: Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia (2003) 130 FCR 569 Aqua-Marine Marketing Pty Ltd v Pacific Reef Fisheries (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 57 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 1) (2012) 207 FCR 448
Date of hearing: 6 and 11 June 2014
Date of last submissions: 11 June 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the First and Second Applicants: Mr DH Murr SC and Ms M Painter SC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate