Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v COLES SUPERMARKETS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 004 189 708)
File number: VID 475 of 2013
Judge: ALLSOP CJ
Date of judgment: 18 June 2014
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – Australian Consumer Law ss 18(1), 29(1)(a), 33 – Misleading or deceptive conduct or conduct likely to mislead or deceive, false or misleading representations, conduct liable to mislead the public – Whether the use of the phrases "baked today, sold today", "freshly baked", "baked fresh" and "freshly baked in-store" is misleading where the complete baking process is not undertaken in-store on the day – Whether the relevant context for assessing misleading or deceptive conduct includes a cynical consumer culture PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Admissibility of evidence – relevance – whether evidence of third party conduct is relevant – hearsay – whether statements made by third parties serve a non-hearsay purpose
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law), ss 18(1), 29(1), 33 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 78, 79, 191(2)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dukemaster Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 682 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; 304 ALR 186 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Turi Foods Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 665 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60; 218 CLR 592 Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International [2000] HCA 12; 202 CLR 45 CRW Pty Ltd v Sneddon (1972) AR (NSW) 17 Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd (1994) 124 ALR 548 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2013] HCA 1; 294 ALR 404 Interlego AG v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 348 Keehn v Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd (1977) 14 ALR 77 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 44; 149 CLR 191 Reckitt & Coleman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491; 17 IPR 1 Ritz Hotel Ltd v Charles of the Ritz Ltd (1987) 14 NSWLR 104 Taco Company of Australia v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (1992) 38 FCR 1 Trade Practices Commission v J & R Enterprises (1991) 99 ALR 325 Westpac Banking Corporation v Northern Metals Pty Ltd (1989) 14 IPR 499 Secondary Materials: Shorter Oxford Dictionary on Historical Principles 3rd edition, vol 1 Date of hearing: 20 February 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate