Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stanley v Service to Youth Council Incorporated (No 2) [2014] FCA 644 Citation: Stanley v Service to Youth Council Incorporated (No 2) [2014] FCA 644
Parties: ARVINA NONA STANLEY v SERVICE TO YOUTH COUNCIL INCORPORATED
File number: SAD 64 of 2013
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 20 June 2014
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – application to adduce tendency evidence – applicant made redundant while on maternity leave – sought to adduce evidence from another employee of the respondent who was made redundant while on maternity leave – whether significant probative value – whether reasonable notice given
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 97, 99, 100 Evidence Regulations 1995 (Cth) reg 6 Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Act 1999 (Cth) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 65, 83, 84 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 30.31 Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth)
Cases cited: Jacara Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd [2000] FCA 1886; (2000) 106 FCR 51 Martin v State of New South Wales [2002] NSWCA 337 Richards v Macquarie Bank Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 1403; (2012) 301 ALR 494 Robinson v Goodman [2013] FCA 893 Twynam Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v AWB (Australia) Ltd [2008] FCA 1922
Date of hearing: 30 September, 1 October and 8 October 2013
Place: Adelaide
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate