Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fieldturf Tarkett Inc v Tigerturf International Limited [2014] FCA 647 Citation: Fieldturf Tarkett Inc v Tigerturf International Limited [2014] FCA 647
Appeal from: Fieldturf Tarkett Inc v Tigerturf International Limited [2011] APO 2; Fieldturf Tarkett Inc v TigerTurf International Limited [2011] APO 3
Parties: FIELDTURF TARKETT INC v TIGERTURF INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 96 of 2011; NSD 227 of 2011
Judge(s): JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 20 June 2014
Catchwords: PATENTS – patent consisting of combination of integers – lack of novelty – lack of inventive step – lack of clarity – prior art – anticipation by prior document or prior publication – anticipation by prior use or prior act – enabling disclosure – whether documents or information publicly available – whether information common general knowledge – effect of hindsight on reliability of evidence as to anticipation by prior act
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 7(1), 7(2), 18(1)(b)(i), 18(1)(b)(ii), 40(3), 60(4)
Cases cited: Aktiebolaget HÄssle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (1999) 44 IPR 593; [1999] FCA 628 Aktiebolaget HÄssle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2002) 212 CLR 411; [2002] HCA 59 Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S (2008) 76 IPR 618; [2008] FCA 559 Apotex Pty Ltd (formerly Genrx Pty Ltd) v Sanofi-Aventis (2008) 78 IPR 485; [2008] FCA 1194 Aspirating IP Ltd v Vision Systems Ltd (2010) 88 IPR 52; [2010] FCA 1061 Austal Ships Pty Ltd v Stena Rederi Aktiebolag (2005) 66 IPR 420; [2005] FCA 805 Bradken Resources Pty Ltd v Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd (2012) 210 FCR 21; [2012] FCA 944 Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd (2012) 290 ALR 47; [2012] FCA 467 British Acoustic Films Ltd v Nettlefold Productions (1936) 53 RPC 221 C Van der Lely NV v Bamfords Ltd (1962) 1A IPR 86 Commissioner of Patents v Microcell Ltd (1958) 102 CLR 232; [1959] HCA 71 Commonwealth Industrial Gases Ltd v MWA Holdings Pty Ltd (1970) 180 CLR 160; [1970] HCA 38 Dynamite Games Pty Ltd v Aruze Gaming Australia Pty Ltd (2013) 103 IPR 373; [2013] FCAFC 96 Elconnex Pty Ltd v Gerard Industries Pty Ltd (1992) 25 IPR 173; [1992] FCA 556 Eli Lilly & Company Ltd v Apotex Pty Ltd (2013) 100 IPR 451; [2013] FCA 214 F Hoffman-La Roche AG v New England Biolabs Inc (2000) 99 FCR 56; [2000] FCA 283 Fallshaw Holdings Pty Ltd v Flexello Castors & Wheels Pty Ltd (1993) 26 IPR 565; [1993] FCA 340 Fomento Industrial SA v Mentmore Manufacturing Co Ltd [1956] RPC 87 General Tire & Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co [1972] RPC 457 Genetics Institute Inc v Kirin-Amgen Inc (1999) 92 FCR 106; [1999] FCA 742 H Lundbeck A/S v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2009) 177 FCR 151; [2009] FCAFC 70 Hill v Evans (1862) 1A IPR 1 Insta Image Pty Ltd v KD Kanopy Australasia Pty Ltd (2008) 78 IPR 20; [2008] FCAFC 139 Jupiters Ltd v Neurizon Pty Ltd (2005) 222 ALR 155; [2005] FCAFC 90 Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 274; [2004] HCA 58 Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (No 2) (2007) 235 CLR 173; [2007] HCA 21 Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v Pike Signals Ltd [1993] RPC 107 Merck & Co Inc v Arrow Pharmaceuticals Ltd (2006) 154 FCR 31; [2006] FCAFC 91 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc v HN Norton & Co Ltd (1995) 33 IPR 1 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Tyco Electronics Pty Ltd (2002) 56 IPR 248; [2002] FCAFC 315 Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd (1980) 144 CLR 253; [1980] HCA 9 New England Biolabs Inc v F Hoffman-La Roche AG (2004) 141 FCR 1; [2004] FCAFC 213 Nicaro Holdings Pty Ltd v Martin Engineering Co (1990) 91 ALR 513; 16 IPR 545; [1990] FCA 40 Old Digger Pty Ltd v Azuko Pty Ltd (2000) 51 IPR 43; [2000] FCA 676 PLG Research Ltd v Ardon International Ltd [1993] FSR 197 Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (2013) 101 IPR 11; [2013] FCA 368 Re Bristol-Myers Co's Application [1969] RPC 146 Stanway Oyster Cylinders Pty Ltd v Marks (1996) 66 FCR 577; [1996] FCA 1544 Sunbeam Corporation v Morphy-Richards (Aust) Pty Ltd (1961) 180 CLR 98; [1961] HCA 39 Wake Forest University Health Sciences v Smith & Nephew Pty Ltd (No 2) (2011) 92 IPR 496; [2011] FCA 1002 Welch Perrin & Co Pty Ltd v Worrel (1961) 106 CLR 588; [1961] HCA 91 Windsurfing International Inc v Petit (1983) 3 IPR 449
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate