Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Damorgold Pty Ltd v JAI Products Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCA 651 Citation: Damorgold Pty Ltd v JAI Products Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCA 651
Parties: DAMORGOLD PTY LTD (ACN 051 905 705) and VERTILUX CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 074 643 182) v JAI PRODUCTS PTY LTD (ACN 126 185 377); JAI PRODUCTS PTY LTD (ACN 126 185 377); DAMORGOLD PTY LTD (ACN 051 905 705) and VERTILUX CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 074 643 182)
File number: VID 1051 of 2010
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 20 June 2014
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth)
Cases cited: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Apotex Pty Ltd (No 5) (2013) 104 IPR 23 Grant v Australian Temporary Fencing Pty Ltd (2003) 59 IPR 170 Pharmacia Italia SpA v Interpharma Pty Ltd (2005) 67 IPR 397
Date of hearing: 6 June 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 42
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr G McGowan QC with Dr W Rothnie
Solicitor for the Applicants: Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms H Rofe with Mr C Thompson
Solicitor for the Respondent: Griffith Hack Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1051 of 2010
BETWEEN: DAMORGOLD PTY LTD (ACN 051 905 705)
First Applicant
VERTILUX CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 074 643 182)
Second Applicant
JAI PRODUCTS PTY LTD (ACN 126 185 377)
Cross-Claimant
AND: JAI PRODUCTS PTY LTD (ACN 126 185 377)
Respondent
DAMORGOLD PTY LTD (ACN 051 905 705)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate