Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Flight Centre Limited v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2014] FCA 658 Citation: Flight Centre Limited v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2014] FCA 658
Parties: FLIGHT CENTRE LIMITED ACN 003 377 188 v AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION
File number: QUD 150 of 2014
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 19 June 2014
Corrigendum: 20 June 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay of execution of orders requiring payment of pecuniary penalties and costs – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 29(1) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 76(1)(d) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 39.06, 41.03
Cases cited: ACCC v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 238 ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 88 ALJR 176; [2013] HCA 54 Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 McLean Technic Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 737 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v ACCC (1996) 71 FCR 285 Powerflex Services Pty Ltd v Data Access Corp (1996) 67 FCR 65 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v ACCC (2012) 287 ALR 249; [2012] FCAFC 20 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd (1991) ATPR 41-076; [1990] FCA 762
Date of hearing: 9 May 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate