Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wong v Sklavos [2014] FCA 679 Citation: Wong v Sklavos [2014] FCA 679
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Sklavos v Australasian College of Dermatologists [2014] FCA 476
Parties: DR DAVID WONG AND OTHERS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE v ANGELO SKLAVOS and THE AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF DERMATOLOGISTS DR ANDREW SATCHELL v ANGELO SKLAVOS and THE AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF DERMATOLOGISTS
File numbers: NSD 520 of 2014 NSD 522 of 2014
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 26 June 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeals – application for leave to appeal from an interlocutory judgment – application by non-party – subpoenas to produce documents issued to non-parties – subpoenas sought tax returns and income information for dermatology practices – application to set aside the subpoenas dismissed – whether "apparent relevance" established – whether primary judge's decision attended by sufficient doubt – whether substantial injustice PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – subpoenas – where information confidential
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Apache Northwest Pty Ltd v Western Power Corporation (1998) 19 WAR 350 Campaign Master (UK) Limited v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 4) [2010] FCA 398 Commonwealth v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2000) 98 FCR 241 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Dorajay Pty Ltd v Aristocrat Leisure Ltd [2005] FCA 588 Fortress Credit Corporation (Australia) II Pty Ltd v Fletcher (2011) 281 ALR 38 Georges v Seaborn International Pty Ltd (Trustee) [2012] FCA 294 Hamilton v Oades (1989) 166 CLR 486 Johnston v Cameron (2002) 124 FCR 160 McHugh v Australian Jockey Club Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 724 Nexus Energy Corporate Pty Ltd v Trident Australasia Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1328 R v Barton [1981] 2 NSWLR 414 Rawson Finances Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 139 Re North Coast Transit Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 1912 Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238 Santos Ltd v Pipelines Authority of SA (1996) 66 SASR 38 Sklavos v Australasian College of Dermatologists [2014] FCA 476 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd (No 2) (1989) 88 ALR 90
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate