Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nextra Australia Pty Limited v Fletcher (No 2) [2014] FCA 682 Citation: Nextra Australia Pty Limited v Fletcher (No 2) [2014] FCA 682
Parties: NEXTRA AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 070 924 677) v MARK TIMOTHY FLETCHER
File number: QUD 146 of 2011
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 26 June 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – applicant substantially successful in claim against respondent for misleading and deceptive conduct – s 18 Australian Consumer Law – applicant granted orders for removal and restraint of publication of misleading blog post – applicant made earlier offer to discontinue proceedings on basis respondent remove blog post and pay an amount to the applicant being less than the applicant's final costs – alternative offer made by applicant to bear own costs on condition respondent not make further public disparaging comments – whether applicant entitled to indemnity costs – r 25.14(3) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – applicant withdrew claim for damages sixteen months prior to hearing – costs of amending applicant's statement of claim earlier reserved – respondent made offer to settle on basis respondent pay part of applicant's final costs and applicant discontinue proceedings – second settlement offer by respondent to settle on basis it remove blog and applicant pay his costs – whether applicant's entitlement to costs ought be discounted – whether respondent entitled to any costs – whether applicant's offer constituted genuine compromise – whether applicant unnecessarily continued proceedings in light of respondent's offers
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(2) Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) s 18 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 25.01, 25.14, 40.03
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate