Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 723 Citation: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 723
Parties: AUSTRALIAN MUD COMPANY PTY LTD ACN 009 283 416 and REFLEX INSTRUMENTS ASIA PACIFIC PTY LTD ACN 124 204 191 v CORETELL PTY LTD ACN 119 188 493, MINCREST HOLDINGS PTY LTD ACN 068 672 471 (TRADING AS CAMTEQ INSTRUMENTS), NICKY KLEYN and KLEYN INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 118 967 687 (TRADING AS CAMTEQ INTERNATIONAL SERVICES)
File number: NSD 2082 of 2011
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 4 July 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – application for further discovery – whether a breach of earlier orders - lateness of the application after 12 days of trial – substantial volume of documents voluntarily disclosed during trial – insufficient identification of further documents likely to be of assistance
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 20.11, 20.14, 20.16, 20.17
Cases cited: Alanco Australia Pty Ltd v Higgins (No 2) [2011] FCA 1063 Harcourts WA Pty Ltd v Roy Weston Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 107 Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 14) [2011] FCA 1159
Date of hearing: 2 July 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 23
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr JM Hennessy SC
Solicitor for the Applicants: Gilbert + Tobin
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate