Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCA 729 Citation: Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCA 729
Parties: BRETT REAPER v BAYCORP COLLECTIONS PDL (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD and PETER VRSECKY AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF BRETT VINCENT REAPER
File number: VID 985 of 2013
Judge: PAGONE J
Date of judgment: 3 July 2014
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – failure to produce documents in accordance with subpoena – whether failure was wilful or deliberate.
Cases cited: Ali v Collection Point Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1125 Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98 Bank of New South Wales v Withers (1981) 52 FLR 207 Metcash Trading Limited v Bunn (No 5) [2009] FCA 16 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525
Date of hearing: 3 July 2014
Date of last submissions: 3 July 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for Jim Stephenson: Mr M Gurvich
Solicitor for Jim Stephenson: Thomson Geer
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 985 of 2013
BETWEEN: BRETT REAPER
Applicant
BAYCORP COLLECTIONS PDL (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
Respondent
PETER VRSECKY AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF BRETT VINCENT REAPER
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate