Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wang v Botany View Hotel [2014] FCA 730 Citation: Wang v Botany View Hotel [2014] FCA 730
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Wang v Botany View Hotel [2014] FCCA 850
Parties: YUN FU WANG v BOTANY VIEW HOTEL
File number(s): NSD 551 of 2014
Judge(s): JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 8 July 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – primary judge dismissed proceedings as frivolous or vexatious, abuse of process and for applicant's failure to comply with court order – applicant filed several voluminous and incomprehensible documents – whether extension of time should be granted to seek leave to appeal primary judge's decision
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rules 1.03, 13.03A, 13.03B, 13.10 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rules 35.13, 35.14
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Burton v Shire of Bairnsdale (1908) 7 CLR 76 Croker v Philips Electronics Australia Ltd [2000] FCA 1731 DÉcor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Deighton v Telstra Corp [1997] FCA 1568 Hunter v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529; [1981] 3 All ER 727 Paramasivam v University of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 1189 Sharman License Holdings Ltd v Universal Music Aust Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 802
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate