Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tax Practitioners Board v Su [2014] FCA 731 Citation: Tax Practitioners Board v Su [2014] FCA 731
Parties: TAX PRACTITIONERS BOARD v TSU CHIEN SU
File number(s): NSD 12 of 2014
Judge(s): JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 10 July 2014
Catchwords: CIVIL PENALTIES – quantum – applicant contravened Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) s 50-20 by recklessly making false, incorrect or misleading statements to Commissioner of Taxation – relevant considerations in fixing appropriate penalty – statements not deliberately or knowingly false – no intention to mislead Commissioner – tax agent registration terminated as result of conduct – loss caused to Commonwealth – inconvenience to taxpayers – specific deterrence – general deterrence – early admission of contraventions – totality principle – proportionality of penalty to objective seriousness of contravening conduct – parity principle
Legislation: Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) ss 40-5(1)(b), 40-25(1), 50-5, 50-20, 50-35, 60-125(2)
Cases cited: Attorney-General (SA) v Tichy (1982) 30 SASR 84 Australian Building & Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2010] FCA 977 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Energy Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 336 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Liquorland (Australia) Pty Ltd [2005] ATPR 42-070; [2005] FCA 683 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Marksun Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 695 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 382 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2010) 188 FCR 238; [2010] FCA 790 Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith (2008) 165 FCR 560; [2008] FCAFC 8 Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 305 ALR 323; [2014] HCA 2 Cameron v The Queen (2002) 209 CLR 339; [2002] HCA 6 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Mornington Inn Pty Ltd v Jordan (2008) 168 FCR 383; [2008] FCAFC 70 Ponzio v B & P Caelli Constructions Pty Ltd (2007) 158 FCR 543; [2007] FCAFC 65 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 287 ALR 249; [2012] FCAFC 20 Tax Practitioners Board v Dedic [2014] FCA 511 Tax Practitioners Board v Munro [2012] FCA 1338 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate