Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fiorentino v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2014] FCA 735 Citation: Fiorentino v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2014] FCA 735
Parties: PINO FIORENTINO v ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL, COMPANIES AUDITORS AND LIQUIDATORS DISCIPLINARY BOARD and AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
File number: NSD 679 of 2014
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 7 July 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Interlocutory injunction – Whether there is a serious question to be tried – Where injunction sought to restrain gazetting of notice of a decision made by Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 41(2) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 1292, 1296 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B
Cases cited: Australian Coarse Grain Pool Pty Ltd v Barley Marketing Board of Queensland (1982) 46 ALR 398 Cahill v Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (2006) 151 IR 41 Epitoma Pty Ltd v Australiasian Meat Industry Employees' Union (No 2) (1984) 54 ALR 730 ERB International Pty Ltd (deregistered), Re [2014] NSWSC 200 Fiorentino v Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board [2014] FCA 641 R v Bowen; Ex parte Federated Clerks Union of Australia (1984) 154 CLR 207 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 1 ALD 383
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate