Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lampton on behalf of the Juru People v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 736 Citation: Lampton on behalf of the Juru People v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 736
Parties: RAYMOND LAMPTON, RAYMOND GASTON, COLLEEN POWER, RAYLENE OUI, TANYA CHATFIELD, IRIS GLENBAR, LENORA ALDRIDGE AND VINCENT MUNDRABY ON BEHALF OF THE JURU PEOPLE v STATE OF QUEENSLAND & ORS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
File number: QUD 554 of 2010
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 11 July 2014
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – Aboriginals And Torres Strait Islanders – determination by consent under s 87A of Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Cases cited: Long v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 571 applied Mabo v State of Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 referred to Munn (for and on behalf of the Gunggari People) v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 applied Northern Territory of Australia v Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakaya Native Title Claim Group (2005) 145 FCR 442 applied Prior on behalf of the Juru (Cape Upstart) People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2011] FCA 819 referred to Smallwood v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 331 referred to Prior on behalf of the Juru People v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 332 referred to Reference: The Hon R.S. French AC, Native Title – A Constitutional Shift?, published in: H.P. Lee and P. Gerangelos (ed), Constitutional Advancement in a Frozen Continent: Essays in Honour of George Winterton, The Federation Press, 2009, pp 126-154)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate