Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kweifio-Okai v Australian College of Natural Medicine [2014] FCA 746 Citation: Kweifio-Okai v Australian College of Natural Medicine [2014] FCA 746
Parties: DR GEORGE KWEIFIO-OKAI v AUSTRALIAN COLLEGE OF NATURAL MEDICINE TRADING AS ENDEAVOUR COLLEGE OF NATURAL HEALTH
File number: VID 305 of 2014
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 15 July 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory injunction
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 – referred to Businessworld Computers Pty Ltd v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1988) 82 ALR 499 – referred to
Date of hearing: 15 July 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Follett
Solicitor for the Respondent: Maddocks
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION VID 305 of 2014
BETWEEN: DR GEORGE KWEIFIO-OKAI
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN COLLEGE OF NATURAL MEDICINE TRADING AS ENDEAVOUR COLLEGE OF NATURAL HEALTH
Respondent
JUDGE: TRACEY J DATE OF ORDER: 15 JULY 2014 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's application for an interlocutory injunction be refused. 2. Discovery be provided by the Applicant pursuant to Rule 20.13 of the following documents, or categories of documents: (a) all information, including contracts and payments details, relating to any work undertaken by the Applicant since May 2014. 3. Discovery be provided by the Respondent pursuant to Rule 20.13 of the following documents, or categories of documents: (a) the independent investigation report into allegations made against the Applicant; and (b) all email correspondence between the Applicant and Ms Carolyn Barker in October 2013. 4. The Applicant's and the Respondent's lists of documents be served upon the other party by 5:00 pm on 4 August 2014. THE COURT DIRECTS THAT: 5. Inspection of the documents by the parties be completed by 6 August 2014. 6. On or before 27 August 2014, the Applicant file and serve: (a) his contentions of fact and law; and (b) any further affidavit material on which he intends to rely. 7. On or before 17 September 2014, the Respondent file and serve: (a) its contentions of fact and law; and (b) any further affidavit material on which it intends to rely. 8. Pursuant to r 28.03 of the Federal Court Rules, the proceeding be referred to mediation by a Registrar of the Court. The mediation be conducted on a date not before 24 September 2014. In the event that the matter does not settle at the conclusion of the initial mediation, the Registrar conduct a case management conference immediately following the mediation to consider the most economic and efficient means of bringing the proceedings to trial and of conducting the trial, at which conference the Registrar may give further directions. The mediator is to report the result of the mediation / case management conference to the Court as soon as possible after the mediation. 9. The matter be set down for hearing on 20 October 2014 on an estimate of two days. 10. Costs reserved. 11. Liberty to apply. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate