Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
James v Leighton Holdings Limited [2014] FCA 756 Citation: James v Leighton Holdings Limited [2014] FCA 756
Parties: THOMAS JAMES v LEIGHTON HOLDINGS LIMITED (ACN 004 482 982) AND LEIGHTON SUPERANNUATION PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 002 035) AS TRUSTEE OF THE LEIGHTON SUPERANNUATION FUND
File number: NSD 1688 of 2013
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 18 June 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – whether documents are "directly relevant" to the issues raised
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Date of hearing: 18 June 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 29
Counsel for the Applicant: LT Livingston
Solicitor for the Applicant: Maurice Blackburn Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: J Williams
Solicitor for the Respondents: Herbert Smith Freehills
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1688 of 2013
BETWEEN: THOMAS JAMES
Applicant
AND: LEIGHTON HOLDINGS LIMITED (ACN 004 482 982)
First Respondent
LEIGHTON SUPERANNUATION PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 002 035) AS TRUSTEE OF THE LEIGHTON SUPERANNUATION FUND
Second Respondent
JUDGE: WIGNEY J DATE OF ORDER: 18 JUNE 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's interlocutory application dated 9 May 2014 is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of, and occasioned by, the interlocutory application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate