Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nand v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 757 Citation: Nand v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 757
Appeal from: Nand v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCCA 1300
Parties: SHARDA NAND v FUJI XEROX AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED ACN 000 341 819
File number(s): NSD 641 of 2014
Judge(s): YATES J
Date of judgment: 18 July 2014
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY - application for stay of proceedings under a sequestration order made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – whether review of registrar's decision conducted as a de novo hearing as required
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 37 Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 104 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 36.08, 39.04 Federal Circuit Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2006 (Cth) Cases cited: Boumelhem v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2008) 171 FCR 462 Cottrell v Wilcox [2001] FCA 866 Evans v Heather Thiedeke Group Pty Ltd (1990) 95 ALR 424 Freeman v National Australia Bank Limited [2002] FCA 427 Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited v Print Media & Publishing Group (Australia) Pty Limited [2014] NSWSC 112 Martin v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2001) 217 ALR 634 Nand v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCCA 1300 Pattison v Hadjimouratis (2006) 155 FCR 226 Reynolds v Aluma-Lite Products Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 322 Watts v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited [2010] FCA 1013 Date of hearing: 16 and 18 July 2014
Place: Sydney
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate