Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oswal v Apache Corporation (No 2) [2014] FCA 778 Citation: Oswal v Apache Corporation (No 2) [2014] FCA 778
Parties: PANKAJ OSWAL v APACHE CORPORATION
File number: WAD 389 of 2013
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 25 July 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – application for stay of proceedings dismissed and costs order made – subsequent request by applicant to vary costs order – no submission in relation to costs during the hearing – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 39.04
Cases cited: Ashby v Slipper (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 67 ACCC v Daniels Corporation Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 936 Dib Group Pty Ltd v Coolabah Tree Aust-Wide Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 57 Grygiel v Baine (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 434 Hanave Pty Ltd v LFOT Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 572 Preston Erection Pty Ltd v Speedy Gantry Hire Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 122
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 10 July 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kennedys
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clyde & Co
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 389 of 2013
BETWEEN: PANKAJ OSWAL
Applicant
AND: APACHE CORPORATION
Respondent
JUDGE: GILMOUR J DATE OF ORDER: 25 JULY 2014 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate