Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dennis v Chambers Investment Planners Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 4) [2014] FCA 784 Citation: Dennis v Chambers Investment Planners Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 4) [2014] FCA 784
Parties: JOHN STRICKLAND DENNIS v CHAMBERS INVESTMENT PLANNERS PTY LTD (ACN 009 294 606) (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) and GEORGE KAMEL TAKLA
File number: WAD 292 of 2010
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 29 July 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs on an indemnity basis – offers of compromise – whether applicant's failure to accept offers of compromise was unreasonable
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 1.35; R 25.14; R 25.14(1); R 25.14(2)
Cases cited: Coshott v Learoyd [1999] FCA 276 Dennis v Chambers Investment Planners Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 3) [2014] FCA 648 Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 141 McDonald v Parnell Laboratories (Aust) (No 2) (2007) 164 FCR 591; [2007] FCA 2086
Date of hearing: 27 June 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C Slater
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kott Gunning
Counsel for the Respondents: Dr JT Schoombee
Solicitor for the Respondents: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 292 of 2010
BETWEEN: JOHN STRICKLAND DENNIS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate