Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bond v Beaman [2014] FCA 803 Citation: Bond v Beaman [2014] FCA 803
Parties: CRAIG DAVID BOND v DIANNE ELIZABETH BEAMAN and CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WILLIAMSON AND DAVID ASHLEY NORMAN HURT
File number: WAD 93 of 2014
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 3 June 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay of orders of Family Court of Western Australia pending hearing and determination of appeal before Full Court of Federal Court of Australia
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 208; Div 2 of Part X Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(2BB)
Cases cited: Beaman v Bond [2014] FCWA 27 Philip Morris (Australia) Ltd v Nixon [1999] FCA 1281
Date of hearing: 3 June 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr L Christensen
Solicitor for the Applicant: Gadens
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr P Hannan
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Carr & Co
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr A Mason
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Roe Legal Services
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 93 of 2014
BETWEEN: CRAIG DAVID BOND
Applicant
AND: DIANNE ELIZABETH BEAMAN
First Respondent
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WILLIAMSON AND DAVID ASHLEY NORMAN HURT
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate