Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Investa Properties Pty Ltd v Nankervis (No 6) [2014] FCA 804 Citation: Investa Properties Pty Ltd v Nankervis (No 6) [2014] FCA 804
Parties: INVESTA PROPERTIES PTY LTD (ACN 084 407 241) and INVESTA RESIDENTIAL GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 098 527 390) v ASHLEY COLIN NANKERVIS, ADAM KIMBERLY BARCLAY and OLIVER HUME SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND PTY LTD (ACN 128 863 230)
File number: QUD 231 of 2011
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 1 August 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – s 26(a) and (c) and s 42 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – manner in which evidence to be given by litigants in person – whether respondents have same interests in proceeding – whether respondents should be allowed to cross-examine each others' witnesses – sequence of cross-examination
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 26, 26(a), 26(c), 29(2), 29(3), 42, 42(2)(b), 42(2)(c) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd (2009) 174 FCR 547 Cheers v El Davo Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2000] FCA 144 GPI Leisure Corporation Ltd v Herdsman Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) (1990) 20 NSWLR 15 NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd (No 8) [1999] FCA 266
Date of hearing: 28 July 2014
Place: Brisbane
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate