Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tekno Autosports Pty Limited v Jenkins (No 2) [2014] FCA 809 Citation: Tekno Autosports Pty Ltd v Jenkins (No 2) [2014] FCA 809
Parties: TEKNO AUTOSPORTS PTY LIMITED v BRUCE JENKINS
File number: NSD 215 of 2014
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 30 July 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – indemnity costs – where application to set aside a statutory demand granted
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 459C Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Cases cited: Degmam Pty Ltd (in liq) v Wright (No 2) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354 DSE (Holdings )Pty Ltd v InterTAN [2004] FCA 1251 Growth Equities Corporation Ltd v Genesis Growth Investments Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1302 In the matter of Suters Holdings Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1051 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Professional Advantage Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Commission [2007] NSWSC 607 R2M Ltd v Gourlay [2011] FCA 168 Re Smith; Ex parte Rundle (No 2) (1991) 6 WAR 299 Tekno Autosports Pty Limited v Jenkins [2014] FCA 774
Date of hearing: 29 June 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr Farid Assaf
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Stevens & Associates Lawyers
Solicitor for the Defendant: Mr David Collinge (Gillis Delaney Lawyers)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 215 of 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate