Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oswal v Apache Corporation (No 3) [2014] FCA 835 Citation: Oswal v Apache Corporation (No 3) [2014] FCA 835
Parties: PANKAJ OSWAL v APACHE CORPORATION
File number: WAD 389 of 2013
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 8 August 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to amend defence – r 16.53 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – principles relevant to grant of leave – leave to amend granted
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51A, 52, 82 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.53 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M
Cases cited: Barclay Mowlem Construction Ltd v Dampier Port Authority (2006) 33 WAR 82 I & L Securities Pty Limited v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Limited (2002) 210 CLR 109 Pascoe v Boensch [2009] FCA 1240 S.P.I. Spirits (Cyprus) Ltd v Diageo Australia Ltd (No 4) [2007] FCA 1035 Thomson v STX Pan Ocean Co Ltd [2012] FCAFC 15 University of Sydney v ResMed Limited (No 5) [2012] FCA 232
Date of hearing: 4 August 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr DA McLure
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kennedys
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr SK Dharmananda SC with Mr J Garas
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clyde & Co
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 389 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate