Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZSXE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 867 Citation: SZSXE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 867
Appeal from: SZSXE v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 579
Parties: SZSXE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION AND LUKE HARDY IN HIS CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 378 of 2014
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 6 August 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review – application for protection visa – whether the primary judge erred in finding that the independent merits reviewer applied the correct test for complementary protection – whether the independent merits reviewer impermissibly imported the Refugee Convention test or conflated that test with the complementary protection criterion test – whether the independent merits reviewer erred in considering the motivation of the Taliban to harm the appellant in the past when considering the appellant's complementary protection claims – whether the independent merits reviewer erred in applying both tests to the same findings of fact – whether the independent merits reviewer ignored a claim relating to attacks on the Afghani population generally or in Kabul
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 75 ALD 630 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 NABE v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 243 CLR 319 SZSHK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2013) 138 ALD 26 SZSRY v Minister for Immigration [2014] FCCA 1284
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate