Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Titan Support Systems Inc v Nguyen [2014] FCA 884 Citation: Titan Support Systems Inc v Nguyen [2014] FCA 884
Parties: TITAN SUPPORT SYSTEMS INC v MINH HOANG NGUYEN
File number: NSD 504 of 2014
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 21 August 2014
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – Business conducted by individual over internet – Whether Court has jurisdiction under Australian Consumer Law PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Where respondent failed to defend matter – Proper approach upon application for default judgment – Matters set out in Statement of Claim taken to be admitted – When appropriate to rely on evidence – Evidence permitted to be led as to service – Injunctions requiring ongoing compliance subject to further order of the Court
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law, Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 18, 29, 232 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 4, 6, 86 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 5.22, 5.23, 16.32,
Cases cited: ACCC v Dataline (2006) 236 ALR 665 Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82
Date of hearing: 5 August 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 38
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Bushby (solicitor)
Solicitor for the Applicant: Loke Bushby International
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
Solicitor for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 504 of 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate