Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hazelbane v Northern Territory of Australia [2014] FCA 886 Citation: Hazelbane v Northern Territory of Australia [2014] FCA 886
Parties: GABRIEL HAZELBANE & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE WARAI AND KUNGARAKANY GROUPS v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA & ORS THOMAS EDWARD PETHERICK & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE EMU AND BLUE TONGUE LIZARD CLANS v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA & ORS
File numbers: NTD 6057 of 2001; NTD 21 of 2005
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 21 August 2014
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – application to be joined as respondents to a claim for a determination of native title – applicant claimed to be a representative of the numerous clan groups that hold native title over the claim area - claim struck out – application by motion to further amend the application to adduce further evidence of authorisation – application to further amend refused – claim as then amended was bound to fail – no reasonable foundation that shows the applicant was authorised by the numerous clan groups to make the amended application – no anthropological evidence to support the claims made
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Federal Court Rules Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth) Migration Litigation Reform Act 2005 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate