Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Khaja v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 890 Citation: Khaja v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 890
Appeal from: Raheemuddin v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCCA 922
Parties: RAHEEMUDDIN KHAJA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 223 of 2014
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 13 August 2014
Date of hearing: 13 August 2014
Date of last submissions: 13 August 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: Ms J Randall-Smith of Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 223 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: RAHEEMUDDIN KHAJA
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MORTIMER J DATE OF ORDER: 13 August 2014 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 223 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: RAHEEMUDDIN KHAJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate