Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Johnson v Monti-Haitsma Enterprises Pty Limited (in external administration) [2014] FCA 906 Citation: Johnson v Monti-Haitsma Enterprises Pty Limited (in external administration) [2014] FCA 906
Parties: DEBRA JOHNSON v MONTI-HAITSMA ENTERPRISES PTY LIMITED (IN EXTERNAL ADMINISTRATION)
File number: NSD 713 of 2014
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 26 August 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to file notice of appeal from judgment of Federal Circuit Court of Australia – principles to be applied – where merits of appeal the important consideration – no reasonable prospects of success – application dismissed
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 16, 20, 294(1), 294(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 r 36.05
Cases cited: Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 cited Kerr v Jaroma Pty Ltd t/a Treasury Motor Lodge (1996) 70 IR 469 cited Parker v The Queen [2002] FCAFC 133 cited
Date of hearing: 13 August 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: CATCHWORDS
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R De Meyrick
Solicitor for the Applicant: CBD Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B Cross
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Business Lawyers & Advisors
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 713 of 2014
BETWEEN: DEBRA JOHNSON
Applicant
AND: MONTI-HAITSMA ENTERPRISES PTY LIMITED (IN EXTERNAL ADMINISTRATION)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate