Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sidhu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 935 Citation: Sidhu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 935
Appeal from: Sidhu v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 706
Parties: KARAMJEET SINGH SIDHU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: SAD 73 of 2014
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 22 August 2014
Date of hearing: 22 August 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondents: R Graycar
Solicitor for the Respondents: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 73 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: KARAMJEET SINGH SIDHU
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 22 AUGUST 2014 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to appeal is refused. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs to be taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 73 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: KARAMJEET SINGH SIDHU
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate