Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dahler v Australian Capital Territory [2014] FCA 946 Citation: Dahler v Australian Capital Territory [2014] FCA 946
Parties: CLINTON DAHLER v AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY and MINISTER FOR DISABILITY, CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE (ACT)
File number: ACD 76 of 2014
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 2 September 2014
Catchwords: COURTS AND JUDGES – actual and apprehended bias – prejudgment – criticism of counsel expressed by judge of the Federal Circuit Court in a judgment handed down in a different matter – application for leave to appeal from refusal of judge to recuse himself PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from interlocutory decisions of Federal Circuit Court in relation to costs, dismissal of application to add a respondent in circumstances in which the proposed additional respondent had previously been removed, and in striking out numerous paragraphs of the statement of claim – whether decisions attended with sufficient doubt – whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused
Legislation: Court Procedures Act 2004 (ACT) s 21 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 340, 341, 342, 351, 362, 369, 550, 795 Fair Work Amendment Act 2012 (Cth) Sch 10 Pt 1 Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) reg 6.9 and Sch 6.3 item 14 Federal Circuit Court Rules rr 1.05(3), 21.02(1)(d) Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 79 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(1) Federal Court Rules r 16.02 Legal Profession (Barristers) Rules 2008 (ACT) Public Sector Management Act 1994 (ACT) s 12(4) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 4(8) Bernard Cairns, Australian Civil Procedure, 10th edition, LawBook Co, 2014 G E Dal Pont, Lawyers' Professional Responsibility (4th ed) (Lawbook Co.)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate