Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rudhravaram v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 960 Citation: Rudhravaram v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 960
Appeal from: Rudhravaram v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 1001
Parties: SAIKIRAN RUDHRAVARAM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 249 of 2014
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 4 September 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court – application for adjournment of appeal hearing refused – no jurisdictional error by Migration Review Tribunal or Federal Circuit Court – appeal dismissed with costs.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 360, 362B Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2 cll 572.223, 572.224, 572.225, 572.235, Sch 5A cll 5A404, 5A405
Cases cited: Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Robson [2013] FCA 1430 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd (2013) 303 ALR 199; [2013] HCA 46 Rudhravaram v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 1001 Sali v SPC Ltd (1993) 116 ALR 625 Squire v Rogers (1979) 39 FLR 106 VBAP of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 965
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate