Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Walker v State of South Australia [2014] FCA 962 Citation: Walker v State of South Australia [2014] FCA 962
Parties: LANCE GILBERT WALKER v STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
File number: SAD 162 of 2010
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2014
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – determination of native title application – strike out application - claim area overlaps with other existing native title claims - little evidence to support the very large claim area of the native title application – evidence supports a smaller geographical area of the claim area - whether the authorisation process complied with the legislative requirements – people who were part of the claim group were only those present at the meeting and signed a declaration that they were a member of the claim group – resolution did not constitute all apical ancestors of members of the claim group - whether applicant had the proper authorisation to make the native title application – consultation process was deficient – not all the potential claim group participated in the meetings
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Walker v State of South Australia (No 2) (2013) 215 FCR 254 referred to Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77 cited McKenzie v State of South Australia [2005] FCA 22 cited Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118 cited Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v State of WA (No 9) [2007] FCA 31 cited Quall v Risk [2001] FCA 378 cited Landers v State of South Australia (2003) 128 FCR 495 cited Reid v South Australia [2007] FCA 1479 cited Roe v Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation [2010] FCA 809 cited Far West Coast Native Title Claim v South Australia (No 2) (2012) 204 FCR 542 cited KK v Western Australia (2013) 217 FCR 115 cited Dieri People v State of South Australia [2003] FCA 187 cited Brown v State of South Australia [2009] FCA 206 cited Bolton on behalf of the Southern Noongar Families v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 760 cited Lawson v Minister for Land and Water Conservation [2002] FCA 1517 cited Kite v State of South Australia [2007] FCA 1662 cited Risk v National Native Title Tribunal [2000] FCA 1589 cited Bollison on behalf of Southern Noongan Families v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 760 distinguished
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate