Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reihana v Mastercare Highrise Cleaning Services Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 964 Citation: Reihana v Mastercare Highrise Cleaning Services Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 964
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Reihana v Mastercare Highrise Cleaning Services Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 353
Parties: TONI COLIN REIHANA v MASTERCARE HIGHRISE CLEANING SERVICES PTY LTD
File number: QUD 360 of 2014
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 25 August 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to appeal – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 26.03, 36.05
Cases cited: Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 cited Jess v Scott (1986) 12 FCR 187 cited
Date of hearing: 25 August 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 360 of 2014
BETWEEN: TONI COLIN REIHANA
Applicant
AND: MASTERCARE HIGHRISE CLEANING SERVICES PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: RANGIAH J DATE OF ORDER: 25 August 2014 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal is dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 360 of 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate