Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hodges v Waters (No 5) [2014] FCA 965 Citation: Hodges v Waters (No 5) [2014] FCA 965
Parties: CHARLES HODGES & MARK HODGES AS TRUSTEES OF THE CHARLES HODGES SUPERANNUATION FUND v ANDREA JANE WATERS, KPMG, WELLINGTON INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED, OCTAVIAR LIMITED (ADMINISTRATOR APPOINTED), GUY HUTCHINGS, JOHN ARTHUR WHATELEY, JACK SIMON DIAMOND, CRAIG ROBERT WHITE, DEBORAH BEALE, STEVEN KRIS KYLING, STUART ROBERTSON PRICE, MICHAEL GORDON HISCOCK, MICHAEL CHRISTODOULOU KING, PAUL JOSEPH MANKA, FERNANDO ESTEBAN, RAYMOND KELLERMAN, DAVID MARK ANDERSON, OCTAVIAR LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 107 863 390 and OCTAVIAR ADMINISTRATION PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 069 390
File number: NSD 324 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceeding – proposed settlement – application for Court approval of notices to group members and registration process
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33V
Cases cited: Inabu Pty Ltd v Leighton Holdings Limited [2014] FCA 622 McMullin v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd (1998) 84 FCR 1
Date of hearing: 22 August 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr MBJ Lee SC and Mr WAD Edwards
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate